Chemical Goliath Goes after another 
Dairy David

Related Stories:

Lawsuit claims Oakhurst Dairy's marketing campaign is misleading
WMTW, ME - Jul 8, 2003
PORTLAND (AP) -- Oakhurst Dairy in Portland is being sued by Monsanto Company, which
alleges that Oakhurst's marketing campaign that touts its milk as being ...

Commercial free speech may be key

Press Herald, ME - Jul 8, 2003
Monsanto's lawsuit against Oakhurst Dairy charges the dairy with unfair business practices and unfair competition, but the dispute might ultimately boil down ...

Oakhurst lawsuit: David vs. Goliath

Press Herald, ME - Jul 13, 2003
Oakhurst Dairy proudly boasts its milk is from dairies that do not inject artificial growth hormones into their cows. Is it important ...

Monsanto Sues Dairy in Maine Over Label's Remarks on Hormones

New York Times - Jul 11, 2003
... over the labeling of its dairy products. Monsanto has accused Oakhurst Dairy Inc. of engaging in misleading and deceptive marketing ...

Report: Monsanto sues Maine dairy over labeling

St. Louis Business Journal, MO - Jul 14, 2003
Monsanto, which makes the artificial growth hormone Posilac, is accusing Oakhurst Dairy of Portland, Maine, of misleading and disparaging marketing practices ...

Health Highlights: July 12, 2003

Atlanta Journal Constitution, GA - Jul 12, 2003
... The New York Times reports that Monsanto has accused Oakhurst Dairy Inc. of engaging in misleading and deceptive marketing practices. ...

Monsanto Sues Dairy Over Milk Label

HealthCentral.com - Jul 14, 2003
The New York Times reports that Monsanto has accused Oakhurst Dairy Inc. of engaging in misleading and deceptive marketing practices. ...

Monsanto sues milk producer over labeling

Washington Times, DC - Jul 12, 2003
... dairy products, The New York Times reported. Monsanto has accused Oakhurst Dairy Inc. of engaging in misleading and deceptive marketing ...

July 8. 2003

Monsanto sues
Oakhurst Dairy
over advertising


PORTLAND, Maine (AP) Oakhurst Dairy Inc. is being sued by Monsanto Co., which alleges that Oakhurst's marketing campaign that touts its milk as being free of artificial growth hormones is misleading.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Boston, demands that Oakhurst stop advertising that it doesn't sell milk from hormone-treated cows. It also asks that the dairy stop putting labels on its milk containers reading "Our Farmers' Pledge: No Artificial Growth Hormones."

Monsanto officials said Oakhurst's ads and labels are deceptive and disparage Monsanto's products with the inference that milk from untreated cows is better than milk from hormone-treated cows.

"We believe Oakhurst labels deceive consumers; they're marketing a perception that one milk product is safer or of higher quality than other milk," said Jennifer Garrett, director of technical services for Monsanto's dairy business. "Numerous scientific and regulatory reviews throughout the world demonstrate that that's unfounded. The milk is the same, and the amount of protein, fats, nutrients, etc. are all the same."

Oakhurst President Stanley Bennett II said his dairy sells milk without artificial growth hormones because of consumer demands. Oakhurst about five years ago began buying milk only from farms that pledge in writing that they won't use artificial hormones.

"On principle, it's also a question of free speech," Bennett said. "The world seems a little bit discombobulated when somebody attempts to prohibit you from trying to do the right thing."

Artificial growth hormone is a genetically engineered veterinary drug given to cows to increase milk production. Another name for the drug is recombinant bovine somatotropin, or rBST.

Many people oppose the use of rBST, believing it is linked to breast cancer and premature puberty in children. But Monsanto and others argue that no such link exists.  Canada and the European Union have banned the use of the hormone, but the Food and Drug Administration has approved it for use in the United States.

Monsanto, which is based in St. Louis and is the leading producer of rBST, had revenues of $4.7 billion in 2002. Oakhurst, based in Portland, had sales of $185 million, according to Bennett.

Monsanto spokesman Lee Quarles said Monsanto has not filed similar lawsuits against other dairies, but wouldn't say whether more were planned. Monsanto filed similar suits against two dairies in Illinois about 10 years ago, and both were settled out of court under confidential terms, he said.

The suit against Oakhurst claims unfair competition, unfair business practices and interference with advantageous business relationships.

According to the suit, the business relationships between Monsanto and dairy producers who use the artificial growth hormone have suffered because the farmers will stop using the treatments.

Bennett said his company makes no claims on the science involved with growth hormones.  "We're in the business of marketing milk, not Monsanto's drugs," he said.

Earlier this year, Maine Attorney General Steven Rowe rejected a request from Monsanto that Maine abandon its Quality Trademark Seal program that indicates when milk is free of artificial growth hormones.

Monsanto argued that the seal, which was adopted in 1994, misleads consumers into thinking that hormone-free milk is superior to milk using an artificial growth hormone. 

VISIT OUR BULLETIN BOARD, POST A MESSAGE